Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superior College, Dera Ghazi Khan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draftify‎ . The article was draftified and the resulting redirect subsequently deleted by User:Fastily per R2. (non-admin closure) Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 19:31, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Superior College, Dera Ghazi Khan[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promo piece on a non-notable school. Sources cited are primary, directory listings, and social media, and a search only finds more of the same. Was previously draftified but the creator insists on publishing it, so next stop AfD. Fails WP:GNG / WP:ORGCRIT. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:14, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator as article has been moved back to drafts (see discussion below). --DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:49, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Education, and Pakistan. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:14, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your feedback on my article. I understand that it may not meet the criteria for inclusion due to a lack of reliable sources and notability of the subject matter. I will take your comments into consideration and work to improve the article's content, including finding additional reliable sources to support the article's notability. I appreciate your input and the opportunity to make this article more informative and valuable. Golgooo (talk) 13:40, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize, but I didn't include any promotional language in the article. I only stated the goals of the college. If you believe any part of the statement contains promotional language, you can remove those specific sections instead of deleting the entire article. The college exists in reality, and it should have a Wikipedia page since Wikipedia is a reliable source of knowledge. Golgooo (talk) 13:57, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is Wikipedia exclusively reserved for notable schools? Is it an encyclopedia solely dedicated to documenting noteworthy educational institutions? Golgooo (talk) 14:07, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Schools need to meet WP:NSCHOOL to have an article. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:18, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As you may or may not know, it has a strong connection to Superior University, which is already recognized as a notable institution. And now, their collaborative project NFT Meta Market has secured the 1st Runner Up position in the IT, Cyber, and E-commerce Sector category at the Grand Finale of National Idea Bank held at Sir Syed University of Engineering and Technology.

This achievement shows that Superior College is not just any college, but a notable one that produces graduates who are capable of making significant contributions to the technology industry. Plus, their history of producing successful alumni in various fields is further proof of their significance and impact.

Given all these strengths, I think Superior College deserves a Wikipedia page. What do you think? Golgooo (talk) 14:38, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as promotional with no claim to notability, but no objection to draft space if creator agrees to wait for a neutral acceptance through AfC. Star Mississippi 16:58, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your response and your suggestion to resubmit the page as a draft in the Articles for Creation space. I appreciate your feedback and will work to improve the content and meet Wikipedia's standards for notability, verifiability, and neutrality.

I understand the importance of maintaining a neutral tone and avoiding promotional language in the article. I will take the necessary steps to ensure that the content is informative and neutral in tone.

But I would like to hear your comments on how I can make this article more notable and improve its chances of being accepted?

Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to submitting a revised draft for review in the near future. Golgooo (talk) 17:26, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for moving this. (@DoubleGrazing you can probably withdraw?)

@Golgooo you need significant, in depth sourcing about the school. Not what it says about itself. Star Mississippi 17:39, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I will withdraw, of course. Would have been better all around if this had stayed in drafts to begin with, but hey ho... -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:45, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your feedback. I understand that reliable and independent sourcing is crucial to establishing notability on Wikipedia. I will work on finding more comprehensive sources to strengthen the article and provide a balanced and neutral perspective. Would you be able to suggest any specific sources or areas of focus that I should prioritize in my research? Golgooo (talk) 17:47, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.