Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supercars.net (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:59, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Supercars.net[edit]

This article still fails WP:WEB and WP:V is shaky as well, with the absence of secondary sources. A web search revealed no non-trivial sources and being well known is not enough. I would be happy to see it stay if someone has a non-trivial independent source that has dedicated some editorial space to this article, but it has lacked that for many months despite being tagged. Adrian M. H. 17:59, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the article is at Supercars.net - something funny's gone on with the header above. that said, delete as per nom - doesn't appear to reach the needed notability under the website guidelines. Tony Fox (arf!) 19:25, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable, and some parts seem to have NPOV issues. and I fixed the header, should work now. Whs itc hy 20:32, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Whstchy Adrian M. H. 20:34, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I don't feel this meets the standards in WP:WEB. --Tλε Rαnδоm Eδι τ оr 20:51, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No third party notability mentioned, I think it essential for a website article. Jackaranga 23:01, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.