Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supercars.net

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Ichiro (会話|+|投稿記録|メール) 01:03, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Supercars.net

Non-notable fan web site CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 19:20, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. The site is a very usefual and information-rich resource. I use it regularly to get information adn pictures of cars. It has a very complete collection of classic cars. autophile 5:22, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete non notable website --Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 19:22, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Keep : The site has a decent alexa ranking 18,924. We certainly don't need a listing of all the moderators, members, or 'legends', though. The site might be notable, the members definately not. -- Ch'marr 19:24, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete TheRingess 19:54, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. The site itself is an invaluable source for car facts and stats'. The forums are a well known source of bile and holocaust denial... -- stewacide 20:04, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Ask around, its a notorious website.--Sam Ellens 20:23, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

• Keep It is indeed notorious. Half the guys at my school (a large community college in the east bay area) have heard of it, and it is just as notable, if not more notable, than VWVortex, and that page is not being considered for deletion.

• keep the problem is the huge userbase suddenly trying to edit themselves onto the wiki entry. site is a useful source of vehicle information.

• keep It has alot of valuble car information. --Dahlis 20:46, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Alexa rating. Kappa 23:39, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete It's just a fansite forum, and isn't notable or professional enough to deserve an entry. This entry was created by members of the forum as a joke, and should be discarded. 19 February 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep and cleanup, per Alexa data meeting WP:WEB. The forums aren't notable, but the site itself is. Barno 20:48, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

I enjoy homoerotic themes on its forums - P996T