Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super Shark

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:07, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Super Shark[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, WP:NFO and WP:NFSOURCES. I found no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. I did a WP:BEFORE and found nothing suitable or reliable enough to pass WP:NEXIST. The Film Creator (talk) 04:28, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. The Film Creator (talk) 04:28, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Just add ’Fred Olen Ray’ to the Google Books search terms for this film. SIGCOV comes. ~~Willing to add it late~~r.Added some to the page, see for yourself.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 09:28, 1 January 2024 (UTC)(edited 20:47, 2 January 2024 (UTC))[reply]
Keep: There are reviews in Dread Central and Starburst. Somebodyidkfkdt (talk) 09:32, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the reviews above. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 21:17, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per reviews in horror reliable sources such as Dread Central, Starburst, and Horror News, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 23:01, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.