Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super Puma Display Team (Switzerland)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 18:33, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Super Puma Display Team (Switzerland)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not only does this article fail WP:GNG (its only listed reference a dead link that was supposed to go to the subject's web page and all of its external links go to non-independent and sometimes primary sources, nothing better online), it appears to be subverting the consensus established here to redirect the article's non-disambiguated title to here (no comment on whether this subversion was intentional, although this does mean that the disambiguation is inappropriate) _signed,Rosguill ^talk 03:22, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 03:27, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 03:29, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment while nominating the related article F/A-18 Hornet Solo Display (Switzerland), I came across a citation to a reliable source that does actually mention the Super Puma Display Team. However, a short mention in an article in a local paper[1] does not single-handedly make something notable. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 03:47, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~SS49~ {talk} 12:13, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete due to a lack of significant coverage. YSSYguy (talk) 21:39, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.