Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super Obama World

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2010 February 19.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep (WP:SNOW). King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:32, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Super Obama World[edit]

Non-notable marketing spam.--The lorax (talk) 22:48, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per The lorax's suggestion. Aurush kazemini (talk) 23:08, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Silly, but garnered articles from BBC News Online and The Economist among others. the wub "?!" 23:31, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the wub. It is notable, despite the fact that it may be slightly POV. But it can be improved, and the subject matter is definitely encyclopedic.Hello, My Name Is SithMAN8 (talk) 00:03, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Passes WP:N. Schuym1 (talk) 01:02, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep seems to have enough in the way of references. Does not seem spammy, but descriptive.DGG (talk) 04:51, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per all previous "keep" comments. Jeff Silvers (talk) 06:33, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, clearly notable based on sources. Everyking (talk) 06:33, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:14, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:15, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Well sourced in the article. Hobit (talk) 20:00, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.