Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super Granny
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Super Gran. . –Juliancolton | Talk 00:34, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Super Granny[edit]
- Super Granny (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Can't find any notability independent of Sandlot. There isn't any real content here worth merging. A google news search [1] shows no more coverage than things like "Sandlot makes games such as Super Granny" and that is about it. The article used as source is written by the company creator so it doesn't qualify as significant coverage by reliable sources independent of the subject. It is at best a redirect to the company without a merge. Unless someone can provide coverage by reliable non-blogs on this game, or some evidence of awards or something, I can't see any justification for keeping an article on this. Crossmr (talk) 05:07, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Redirect A search turned up no coverage other than the routine coverage and I could find no awards other than those declaring the software as being "virus-free", "spyware-free" and the like. -- Tom N (tcncv) talk/contrib 04:45, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Super Gran. Marasmusine (talk) 14:57, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Super Gran Although these games are well known in the casual sector I've been unable to find any reliable sources outside of GameZebo, and no matter how good that site is having incestuous sourcing does not bode well for neutrality. A real shame. Someoneanother 08:04, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I found some interviews with the CEO, though the games themselves are only mentioned trivially: [2], [3]. SharkD Talk 04:19, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.