Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SuperNET (company)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Enigma^msg 19:02, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SuperNET (company)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly sourced article about yet another unremarkable blockchain related company. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Possibly native advertising, as the creator has only two edits outside this topic. MER-C 09:50, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. ^{cinco de}L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 11:04, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. ^{cinco de}L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 11:04, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. ^{cinco de}L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 11:04, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails GNG. Users in clack channel is not a good indication of notability per N:SLACK. ^{cinco de}L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 11:05, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not a notable company; no good references nor claims of notability. power~enwiki (π, ν) 04:33, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.