Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super-Sonic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:14, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Super-Sonic[edit]
- Super-Sonic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable compilation album. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:07, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Unsure - but it is not speedy-deletion-ready: almost all of the artists are notable. Bearian (talk) 22:12, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Maashatra11 (talk) 23:32, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. While 'almost all of the artists are notable,' notability is not heritable.Mtiffany71 (talk) 04:01, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — Gongshow Talk 04:27, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NALBUMS and nom. Maashatra11 (talk) 08:53, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Non-notable compilation. One of many, many such records churned out by Ronco and flogged through infomercials. Found this newspaper ad but that's all. -- Whpq (talk) 14:13, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.