Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunway Lagoon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 06:00, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sunway Lagoon[edit]

Sunway Lagoon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nearly all of this article is unsourced quasi-advertising material. I couldn't seem to find enough sources to establish its notability, and thus I don't think it can be salvaged. Jasper Deng (talk) 05:18, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. To begin with, a HighBeam Research search turns up 1,332 hits from the New Straits Times. [1] A GBooks search reveals that, along with the expected and substantial coverage in travel guides, multiple references can be found in scholarly literature as well, such as Interconnected Worlds: Tourism in Southeast Asia ("Malaysia's first international standard theme park") [2], The Global Theme Park Industry [3], Unsettling Absences: Urbanism in Rural Malaysia ("Malaysia's most popular theme park") [4], and more. Overwhelmingly passes WP:GNG. --Arxiloxos (talk) 16:54, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 08:06, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 08:06, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Obviously notable. I need not add to what Arxiloxos has said. The article was an ad but I've done a quick Band-Aid fix of that. --Mkativerata (talk) 08:19, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Passes WP:N per a multitude of available reliable sources that provide significant coverage. NorthAmerica1000 10:48, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.