Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunshine Nee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. Mailer Diablo 04:30, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sunshine Nee[edit]

Less than thirty movies. No official website. No citations/awards in field. Nothing notable or newsworthy about this person. Thus delete. Joe Beaudoin Jr. ^{Think out loud} 01:15, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - She is notable, the article just needs to be expanded. It'll be hard, but I can do some research...Nobunaga24 01:27, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
keep thirty movies is singificant and demonstrates notability. the fact that they are pornographic has no effect on this. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 03:19, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Appears in 17 titles listed on IMDB. Jud e (talk,contribs,email) 04:01, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable. 30 movies is not as much as you might think, and the fact that it's porn IS important. Do a web search if you need more evidence MadCow257 04:56, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Per Jude, IMDB is good enough for me! --light darkness^(talk) 05:21, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Hyphen5 07:04, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Lightdarkness --Ugur Basak 10:44, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - Since she has an IMDB page. Kilo-Lima|^(talk) 13:35, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep notable enough. --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 14:29, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Even a quick look through the various references makes clear that this article is patent nonsense, combining several different performers who used a variation of a common pseudonym over 25 years into a single, non-existent person. Probably a speedy delete. Monicasdude 14:34, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above. Brian G. Crawford 14:55, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and rewrite as page about a common pseudonym, as above. Obviously something that could use explaining. ProhibitOnions 20:10, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as for reasons established above. Also note that having an IMDB article is not a statement of notability - IMDB is a film database, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and the first is not a subset of the second. Average Earthman 20:18, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No real name, no date of birth, no town of birth - lacking the bare minimum of verifiable detail for a biography. Porn films are churned out by the dozen, this is just more porncruft. Just zis Guy you know? 22:09, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless and until encyclopedic content can be demonstrated. Henning Makholm 03:39, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Notable --Masssiveego 07:59, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:N --Walter Siegmund (talk) 04:06, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.