Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunshine Coast University Hospital

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. A redirect/merger can always be discussed on the talk page if required. So Why 08:40, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sunshine Coast University Hospital[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Local hospital servicing Sunshine Coast in Queensland, Fails WP:ORG, author may have a COI. Redirect to affiliated University of the Sunshine Coast was reverted. ^{Atsme📞 📧} 17:23, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:29, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:30, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the ABC and Sunshine Coast Daily are independent reliable sources, the ABC article giving substantial detail, the article is informative rather than promotional. Certainly locally notable. Paul foord (talk) 02:52, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, has had plenty of mainstream media coverage during planning and construction. Article is well-cited. Kerry (talk) 00:08, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

comment - let's not forget WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Local coverage is normal - there are thousands upon thousands of local hospitals and they don't all deserve a stand alone article because then you're getting into policy re: WP:NOT. There are probably far more local schools and hospitals around the world than anything else so please let's not make WP a directory listing of them all. To be included in the encyclopedia, they have achieved notability for something - not just because they are a hospital that got a write-up during construction. Notability is not temporary. ^{Atsme📞📧} 00:26, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:16, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:31, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, looking at List of hospitals in Australia, there aren't many ozzie hospitals with a standalone article (or even mentioned in regional/city/town articles?) ("yes coola, but that doesn't mean this or the other hospitals aren't notable, just that ozzie editors are ~~slack~~ ahem, concentrating on other wikiareas at the moment:))". a gsearch for awards bring up quite a few, editors may deem them trivial/promo/non-notable, but anyway, here they are: 2017 Gabriel Poole Award for Building of the Year, a 2017 AVT Best Project Award, 2016 ASI Steel Clad Structures Award winner, a SCUH volunteer nominated for Volunteering Queensland's Excellence in Volunteer Management Award, 2016 Construction Skills Queensland Excellence Awards - Evolution Training and Safety Award for Employer Commitment to Training Excellence for organisations with over $20 million turnover winner, winner of 2017 FDG Stanley Award for Public Architecture and 2017 Karl Langer Award for Urban Design (more info about these guys are here and here with AIA info here, so this looks like a keep. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:43, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, also, looking at WP:NHOSPITALS this is a keeper. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:09, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:16, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete WP:NOTDIRECTORY. it exists, it won some minor awards. There is nothing notable here and existence is not notability. Jytdog (talk) 01:17, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:48, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, for reasons given above by Paul foord, Kerry and Coolabahapple. Ring4ting (talk) 07:45, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It might "exist" but there is a very large amount of material available. There is more than sufficient WP:NEXIST to write a much more in-depth article, about each of its construction history, its facilities, its medical technology, it building management and security systems, with multiple secondary references for all of them. Aoziwe (talk) 13:35, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.