Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunrise on Eagle's Wings
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 03:07, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sunrise on Eagle's Wings[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- Sunrise on Eagle's Wings (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable high school TV show. Notability is vaguely claimed not demonstrated.No indication that it is broadcast outside of the school. Unreferenced and unverifiable. May also be an element of vanity in the long lists of names. DanielRigal (talk) 00:28, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Fails WP:N. Joe Chill (talk) 00:29, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. —DanielRigal (talk) 00:39, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Radio and TV stations and programmes of schools, colleges, hospitals, shops, chicken factories, otter sanctuaries and others assorted are not notable beyond their parent institutions unless they have multiple non-trivial secondary sources that give reasons why they are. None in this case. --A1octopus (talk) 16:41, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - hats off to the folks that made this such an in-depth article, but "its status as one of the very few daily live television productions produced by high school students on a daily basis. It is also one of the longest established" doesn't really meet the bar for notability, I don't think. I'm not really finding any significant coverage by reliable third-sources either, so that leads me to vote for deletion. Cocytus [»talk«] 02:36, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.