Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunnylab

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:26, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sunnylab[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article spam for a non-notable ecommerce website. Most of the references are dead or non-RS and I can't find any coverage outside of press releases and directory entries. Joe Roe (talk) 01:14, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Additional comment: Given that the main contributor has recently disclosed they are undertaking paid editing for another company, I strongly suspect this article was also written with an (undisclosed) COI. Joe Roe (talk) 01:18, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 03:12, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 03:12, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 03:12, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete insufficient independent sources with substantial discussion of the company. Jytdog (talk) 04:50, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- a non-notable company. The article states that "it is a subsidiary of SCIPAC Ltd, [which in turn is] part of BBInternational." It may be more profitable to create an article on BBInternational first, and then articles on various subsidiary units. That said, I cannot find any coverage on the subject in question. Thus, delete. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:51, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Hi there. It is a long long time since I have had anything to do with Sunnylab. As far as I'm aware it doesn't exist anymore. Can I just say that I wssn't paid for helping them and when it was written the COI process was very different as I remember. I have always tried to stay within the rules of Wikipedia.Iainplunkett (talk) 09:08, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The core of the conflict of interest policy (declare your COIs and don't edit articles where you have a COI), hasn't changed since 2011. Joe Roe (talk) 09:16, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as everything here consists and hints PR, nothing at all coming close for substance. SwisterTwister talk 22:27, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.