Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SunniPath

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. MBisanz ^talk 08:53, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

SunniPath

SunniPath (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

• Delete non notable religious organisation, being promoted by an author with WP:COI Mayalld (talk) 11:17, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

• SunniPath is a notable religious institute with over 5000 students and over 1 million monthly users. You can check Alexa to find stats about them. You may also search google to find about the Organization and its wide usage in both Academic and general user circle. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Imran570 (talk • contribs) 2009-01-12 11:58:53
  • Size is not any part of our criteria for deciding whether something should have an article. Sources are. Sources! Sources! Sources! Uncle G (talk) 14:26, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
• Weak Keep: Organization does seem to be notable. There are a lot of ghits, but I couldn't find any from reliable sources. But the organization has been noted by many websites and seems to regarded highly by Muslim communities. Chamal ^talk 13:17, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
• Delete The sources don't seem particularly credible, and I wonder if the author has a COI. Pstanton 19:48, 12 January 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pstanton (talk • contribs)

• Keep: A google search on Wikipedia shows that 91 articles referred to SunniPath. SunniPath on Wikipedia. A search on Alexa shows that 329 sites including Answers.com, wikipedia, and many other notable site used SunniPath as reference. SunniPath in Alexa ^talk 6:30, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
• Keep - Per Chamal N. Livna-Maor (talk) 10:47, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.