Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunil Giri

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:12, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sunil Giri[edit]

Sunil Giri (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fail WP:NMUSIC: Author removed the WP:BLPPROD after citing non-rs (Youtube, Google Map and some other sources) when the prod was about to expire tomorrow. Its been 6 days when i proposed article for deletion and since then author fail to cite any reliable source to support notability. Thank You – GSS (talk) 12:09, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 12:10, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 12:10, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 12:10, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete- I couldn't find much in English reliable sources to demonstrate notability. I believe at the moment the subject fails at WP:NMUSIC and WP:GNG. Hitro talk 10:28, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete- The onlinekhabar articles seem in-dept although it's difficult to judge from the translated version. Unclear if onlinekhabar is a RS. No author, from what I can tell, is identified. The site terms of service make no claims about completeness, accuracy and reliability of the content. Beyond that I've found no in-depth coverage. Claims of awards in the article are unsourced. Gab4gab (talk) 13:54, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.