Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sundeep Malani
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:06, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sundeep Malani[edit]
- Sundeep Malani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable. Fails WP:GNG, WP:RS, WP:DIRECTOR. Most of the given references are not regarded as reliable sources and most of them are just review/news release of the films. So IMHO the subject is not notable at present. Rest I leave to the decision of experienced editors of Wikipedia. Bharathiya (talk) 12:22, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Lacks notability. Only collaborated to minor movies/documentaries/short films. --Koui² (talk) 12:39, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. He has produced 6 feature length films; that immediately meets WP:CREATIVE. Furthemore, there are multiple independent, reliable sources that discuss him in detail, and thus he meets WP:GNG. Perhaps nominator didn't notice that the page had been vandalized with large chuns removed and formatting disrupted prior to the nomination. Qwyrxian (talk) 04:05, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:03, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:03, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:15, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I think there are just enough sources to establish notability. Three refs from national newspapers is fine to support an article. --Anbu121 (talk me) 17:10, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Mr. Stradivarius (have a chat) 05:08, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I'm not well versed in reliable sources on Indian cinema, but this article seems to have them. Meets the WP:GNG as far as I can tell. Vcessayist (talk) 00:28, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.