Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Summit Partners

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:11, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Summit Partners[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a well disguised advert. Many of the references are regurgitated press releases and PR material. This is WP:BOMBARD. Fails WP:CORP and/or needs a massive cleanup of referencing and wording. Fiddle Faddle 14:50, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Fiddle Faddle 14:50, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment the PR needs to be deleted. --Devokewater @ 15:35, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep $20b under management is quite significant --Devokewater @ 16:33, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Might I ask what notability criterion is met by that dollar amount under management? Is it significant? Arguably. Does it support the notability of the subject? No. Ravenswing 19:43, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 17:01, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Quite a few of those references are from the company's own website, the rest are press releases, and I can't find any reliable, third-party coverage to demonstrate notability. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 17:18, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Nor could I. Beyond that, there are all manner of COI/WP:PAID concerns at hand. Take a good look at the article's history; I count the staggering total of seven SPAs whose sole Wikipedia activity was working on this article, not counting anon IPs. This is NOT good. Ravenswing 19:43, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:34, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom --Devokewater @ 16:22, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.