Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Summit Nutritionals International

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:00, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Summit Nutritionals International[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent sources establishing the notoriety of the company. Perfektsionist (talk) 19:32, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:38, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:38, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:38, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:39, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree with nominator. No significant third-party coverage. -- rsjaffe 🗩 🖉 19:54, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I’m good with deletion. Cristiano Tomás (talk) 23:05, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete many sources not independent and whatever is left is not enough. Jaxarnolds (talk) 03:23, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete within the article there aren't reliable independent sources. Searching for sources turns up a FDA warning letter from 2017 and lots of promotional materials. I can't see anything to suggest that it passes WP:CORPDEPTH. Drchriswilliams (talk) 19:53, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable. This is a WP:SNOWball in a winter where there is very little snow. — Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 19:29, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.