Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Summit1g

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Jack Frost (talk) 11:34, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Summit1g[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I would like to ask somepne[sic] to create afd for this article, as this is a non-notable streamer with poor sources available. 118.223.144.122 (talk) 09:53, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination on behalf of IP. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 11:51, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 11:51, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 11:51, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 11:51, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 11:51, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 11:51, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 11:51, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 11:51, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I'm actively editing the article and will update it with adequate notable citations. As for notability the fact that the article passed as a stub, proves that it met Wikipedia AFC criteria, with more edits to the page citing good references it would definitely be improved. Delta fiver (talk) (UTC) 13:50, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The article seems more like a promo. The person is not notable out of twitch either. Ashishkafle (talk) 13:56, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Promotional language is removed and some notable citations have been added. Delta fiver (talk) (UTC) 15:48, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I think it's best if the nominator closes this discussion as the article has been updated and most of the original criteria for deletion has been fixed. If the nominator is ready to consider this proposal, follow this link WP:WDAFD, to learn about how to withdraw the nomination. Delta fiver (talk) (UTC) 09:09, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Bucket loads of sources on this guy: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] includes The Verge and Washington Post. Afd is not a cleanup. AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 10:48, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Per WP:HEY. Article has been cleaned up and improved. He has received some coverage, including the sources indicated above. It's good enough to pass WP:GNG. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 23:29, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I spent over an hour cleaning up the article (It now reads more like a proper wikipedia article rather than an amateurish school newspaper article/promotional material). There were numerous grammatical and formatting corrections (sources that were misplaced/mistitled) that needed to be made. A previous user (or unregistered user) not fluent in English (nor well-versed in proper English grammar) really liked inserting the word "onto" in multiple places throughout the article. StayGoId (talk) 01:48, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the amazing work editors have done to rescue the subject. I’m not one for thinking streamers are notable subjects usually, but this one clearly has had notability established. Red Phoenix ^talk 22:11, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.