Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Summer love (novel)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:01, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Summer love (novel)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

First deleted for violating copyrights. Created again, but still it has no notability and Subin Bhattarai is non-notable too. Bladesmulti (talk) 04:42, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 October 6. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 05:10, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:40, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep :: I have rewritten that in my own language. So I don't know how it is copyright voilation? Next An article on novel is not non-notable when it was most sold and youth-loved novel. AmRit GhiMire 'Ranjit' (talk) 13:32, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:05, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:06, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:53, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Notable as it is the most popular novel in Nepalese market nowadays mostly loved by the youths. Getting to the copyright point, I don't see any copyright voilation as of now. Hackerboyas (Talk) 08:16, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hackerboyas What you mean by popular novel? When there are no citations available, and its author is non-notable. Bladesmulti (talk) 02:52, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bladesmulti What do you mean by no citation when there are 3reference AmRit GhiMire 'Ranjit' (talk) 08:21, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nepali wikipedia, blogspot, fineprint(book seller) are not reliable citations. Bladesmulti (talk) 08:36, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bladesmulti, I know it can be daunting to scour the news sources of some countries, but bad cites in an article with significant claims of notability can merit investigation.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 21:23, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:30, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

comment Since the copyright is not voilated now nd the novel is notable too I request some admin to close this discussion. AmRit GhiMire 'Ranjit' (talk) 02:38, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I have improved the article with sourcing to established Nepali news sources which demonstrate it was a notable bestseller in that country.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 21:22, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Milowent. Bladesmulti (talk) 02:45, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Milowent. AmRit GhiMire 'Ranjit' (talk) 03:17, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bladesmulti,Now do you agree to keep it in wikipedia?? AmRit GhiMire 'Ranjit' (talk) 03:17, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Bladesmulti (talk) 03:48, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

So now, Bladesmulti can you withdraw the afd or close this discussion?AmRit GhiMire 'Ranjit' (talk) 04:43, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone can close it. Bladesmulti (talk) 07:15, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

But how?I dont have admin right.AmRit GhiMire 'Ranjit' (talk) 12:06, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just wait, you don't need admin right for it. When someone will close this AFD, you will know yourself. Bladesmulti (talk) 12:50, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.