Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Summaiya Rizwan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:47, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Summaiya Rizwan[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a journalist, not properly referenced as passing our inclusion standards for journalists. As always, journalists are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because it's possible to verify that they exist -- the notability test requires some evidence of distinction, such as notable journalism awards and/or the reception of third-party (i.e. not from her own employers) coverage about her to externally validate the significance of her work. But this is referenced entirely to primary sources that are not support for notability at all, such as social networking posts, directories of her own work on the self-published website of her own employer and YouTube or DailyMotion videoclips of her doing her job, and doesn't show even one piece of reliable source content in which she's the subject of any coverage or analysis. Again, notability is not passed by sources in which she's doing the speaking or writing about other things, it's passed by sources in which she's the subject that other people are speaking or writing about — but that describes absolutely none of the sources here, and nothing stated in the article is "inherently" notable enough to overlook that problem. Bearcat (talk) 23:58, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 23:58, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 23:58, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 04:35, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:59, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per detailed rationale by Bearcat. Celestina007 (talk) 01:17, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Bearcat.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:37, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.