Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suman Kumar Mallick (Indian Politician)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Comes down to a difference in opinion on whether he meets NPOL/GNG, and there is no consensus either way for that after 14 days. Daniel (talk) 02:26, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Suman Kumar Mallick (Indian Politician)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-elected politician, fails WP:NPOLITICIAN. GermanKity (talk) 08:42, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 08:42, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 08:42, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 08:42, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable, unelected party functionary.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:05, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep a major political party leader and has received significant press coverage, pass WP:NPOL.--Biplab Anand (Talk) 04:06, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 09:13, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, though i know that getting elected to an office is not a precondition for the person to qualify WP:NPOL, i agree that this article should be deleted as the topic is not notable. The coverage which you can see are not enough to write a seperate biography. Heba Aisha (talk) 00:00, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. He has held national offices and he is one of the notable leaders of India's ruling political party, so he passes WP:NPOL. He also received significant press coverage.- Danish Daniel 99 (talk) 09:40, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, easily passes WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. The article has several references which independently discusses his political career, life and work in fair depth. Wiki Engineers (talk) 13:38, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - yeah, clearly meets the requirements of WP:NPOL and WP:GNG as far as I can see. St★lwart¹¹¹ 09:52, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.