Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sultan ul arifeen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn; also moved to Sultan-ul-Arifeen. (non-admin closure) ansh666 22:41, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sultan ul arifeen[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Near duplicate of Sultan Bahu from which most of the text has been copied and pasted. No obvious reason to keep. kashmiri ^TALK 23:50, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect to Sultan Bahu as per nom. Stuartyeates (talk) 02:05, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This Article can Edit In Batter Way

Sultan-ul-Arifeen is a spiritual title in Islamic Sufism which is in past mostly used for two Muslim Saint

Bayazid Bastami (804-874) This title is written on his grave in Arabic writing see Tom Image
Bayazid Tomb

Sultan Bahoo (1630–1691) Title Sultan ul Arifeen also exist on all books written by Sultan Bahoo and on all books written by other authors on life and teachings of Sultan Bahoo, some books are:
Manaqib-e-Sultani
Sultan Bahoo- The Life and Teachings
Noor Ul Huda
Ain-ul-Faqr
Abyat e Bahoo
Hadrat Sultan Bahu Life and Work

these all books freely available on Internet and can be verified easily So deletion or merged with other single Article like Sultan Bahu or Bayazid Bastami is not an Exact action with this Article, So its separate entity is a write action and remove deletion tag — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrashid364 (talk • contribs) 13:31, December 31, 2014‎

Disambiguate if you insist, but the Bayazid Bastami article nowhere mentions this title as applicable to that person, so likely it is your own WP:OR. kashmiri ^TALK 19:06, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No Reason for deletion or merging

No content of this article has been lifted.

This article 'Sultan ul arifeen has a separate identity of its own. The article talks about the titles and status of the saint Sultan Bahoo and should NOT be confused with his biography or history or personality which the article 'Sultan Bahu talks about.

Both the topics are discrete subjects warranting their own articles.

There is no reason for merging the two articles. Neyn (talk) 14:32, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Being the author of Sultan ul arifeen you are not supposed to vote here. Regards, kashmiri ^TALK 19:09, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:37, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have read the comments on his article!!! It is indeed very SADDENING that such arguments are taking place on an article which talks about a well known holy saint of the Subcontinent. I wonder why it has become a trend especially in Pakistan that personal biases and religious enmities are the main focus whereas "Freedom of Speech" and "Freedom of Expression" seem to be fading away. This particular User:Kashmiri is obviously unacknowledged with the famous Islamic saints and holds a personal or religious grudge against Sultan Bahu. It is a religious offense that is very dangerous for any individual, society, sectors, etc.

I REQUEST Wikipedia to take notice.

JugniSQ (talk) 08:08, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination : Article has now been reduced to a more acceptable form after shedding some 17,000 characters. Regards, kashmiri ^TALK 20:01, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.