Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sujeet Swami

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Both "keep" and "delete" !votes are rather weak, except for the nom. However, even after 2 relistings no new sources that are substantial enough to tilt this over GNG have been found. As this is a BLP, I find the "delete" case stronger. Randykitty (talk) 17:11, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sujeet Swami[edit]

Sujeet Swami (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO. Not a social activist in the traditional sense. Known for a single event, getting his 35 Rupees back. Coverage all stems from one event. scope_creepTalk 20:39, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:29, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:29, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Its still all one-event stuff. If he hadn't lost his 35 Rupees and his temper, none of this would have happened. That is a true definition of being non-notable. He didn't create these events, under his own impetus, it was created for him. So its WP:BLP1E fodder. scope_creepTalk 15:05, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:50, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete because coverage are all very similar. They are talking same thing but different words. Mtpos (talk) 14:52, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 03:29, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What else is he known for exactly? scope_creepTalk 14:29, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.