Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suitable reasonable employment (UK)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 00:11, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Suitable reasonable employment (UK)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominating per WP:NOTDIC. Furthermore, source searches are not providing significant coverage as required per WP:N. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:51, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:52, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:54, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This should be part of a larger article on UK unemployment policy. As it is it is just a definition. Kitfoxxe (talk) 13:19, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:11, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:51, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This is a stub not a dictionary entry - see WP:DICDEF, which goes to some trouble to explain the difference. It is easy to find coverage which demonstrates notability - see Employment Law Handbook, for example. Andrew D. (talk) 07:07, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NativeForeigner ^Talk 21:41, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.