Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suhas Gopinath (3rd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:32, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Suhas Gopinath[edit]

Suhas Gopinath (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completing nomination on behalf of User:Dpradeepc, who attempted to nominate this article here. Their rationale is below. I've corrected the AFD template and have moved the link from the 2nd AFD to this one. On the merits, I have no opinion. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 18:27, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not a notable businessman, no notable contribution, the article is purely promotional, the only claim to fame by this person is being youngest CEO there are lot of people out there claiming to be youngest CEO's, media coverage does not make a person notable.Dpradeepc (talk) 18:13, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Media coverage is precisely what makes you notable. -- Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick. (talk) 18:36, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Cimon Avaro. "they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject." WP:BIO. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 21:04, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Extensive Media coverage received which are objective and independent -- Jeevan —Preceding undated comment added 07:05, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:03, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:03, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.