Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sugar Creek Brewing Company

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mz7 (talk) 20:25, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sugar Creek Brewing Company[edit]

Sugar Creek Brewing Company (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All news coverage appears to be local, as is expected for an everyday brewing company. Not notable enough for wikipedia. 2Joules (talk) 06:31, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP There is non-local coverage of the brewery (not used as sources for the article) and it has won multiple national awards at the highest level. For me, easy keep. --BigCheese41 (talk) 10:05, 11 June 2018 (UTC) BigCheese41 (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Blocked sockpuppeteer !vote. Yunshui  11:49, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 14:00, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 14:00, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 14:00, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Agree with above. HeelTar (talk) 14:04, 11 June 2018 (UTC)Striking sock !vote. Yunshui  11:49, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@User:HeelTar Just how did a very new user with less than 50 edits find this AFD so quickly after its creation? 2Joules (talk) 14:06, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Very carefully. And that's 53 edits. :) HeelTar (talk) 14:12, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Only !votes are from confirmed sockpuppeteer and their sock.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui  11:50, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:AUD as the company is covered only in local media and largely by one news outlet, the Charlotte Observer. I could find no regional or national coverage in reliable sources. Geoff | Who, me? 17:52, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I am not logging in due to the contentiousness of this discussion. If you expand the search beyond the full name of the company Sugar Creek Brewing Company which is rarely used you will find this brewery meets notability. --24.199.148.218 (talk) 13:56, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I tried changing the search to "Sugar Creek," which gave lots of hits to other places and things besides the brewery. I then tried "Sugar Creek Brewing," which expanded the hits for the brewery, but still solely in local media outlets and to a couple of passing mentions in blogs. If the "keep" !voters would provide links to other than local sources (and put them in the article), that would be a great help in evaluating the AFD. Geoff | Who, me? 14:41, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.