Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sudha Pennathur
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 09:35, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sudha Pennathur[edit]
- Sudha Pennathur (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Needs citations for "Her work has been featured in the Asian Art Museum and the de Young Museum of San Francisco, the Los Angeles County Museum of Art in Los Angeles, the Metropolitan Museum of Art and the Asia Society in New York and many other museum exhibition shops." in order to be considered notable. -- Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 19:20, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:54, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:55, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:55, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - references have been added. Please re-review. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by FelipeSago (talk • contribs) 20:35, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:09, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Second relist rationale. The article is a BLP. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:10, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I can't verify any of the alleged facts. In fact, much of it is plain misrepresentation. For example, her sari designs are sold at a few museum gift shops, and are not displayed in museums, see [1]. Bearian (talk) 23:25, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.