Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subzero Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:02, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Subzero Records[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This record label does not substantial coverage in independent reliable sources for notability. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 22:04, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 23:50, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 23:50, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - There is not one single independent source in the article as stands, so I went looking. Nada. Nothin'. A label solely distributed by CD Baby is never a good sign. No notable artists. No indication of any influence of significant within any genre or cultural subset. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 13:26, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Richard3120 (talk) 13:44, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. Appears to be purely a label set up by two people to release their own records (Paz is D.J. Joker, Burnett is D. Burn$) and those of acquaintances from San Diego, none of whom are notable. The label's website is dead so I assume that the company has ceased to exist. Richard3120 (talk) 14:01, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - lack of significant coverage, PhilKnight (talk) 01:02, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Lacks coverage. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 03:12, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.