Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subzero (adjective)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 13:13, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Subzero (adjective)[edit]

Subzero (adjective) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a dictionary definition, and an unnecessarily complicated one. "There are two definitions" is followed by "means below zero". Should just be redirected to Subzero or just deleted outright. Primefac (talk) 01:33, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. The nominator seems correct. This is a dictionary word rather than an encyclopedia entry. Rosario (talk) 02:52, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 02:56, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as superfluous to subzero and the already existing Wiktionary entry.—Mythdon (talkcontribs) 07:40, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Multiple dictionary definitions add up to a slightly longer dictionary definition, not an encyclopedia article, and Wikipedia policy is that Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NOT#DICTIONARY). Any search for the term will find it in the existing disambiguation page, so keeping the redirect adds no value. Bakazaka (talk) 20:41, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.