Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subnautica

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. The two sides of this coin were a lack of reliable sources and WP:TOOSOON among the delete camp and a number of reliable sources demonstrated by the keep camp but not clear whether GNG was met. No consensus at this time and will be reviewed later on when either the game is further in development or released. Mkdw ^talk 19:42, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Subnautica[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. No references to reliable independent sources, and searching produced largely blogs, wikia, non-independent sources, Facebook, Twitter, etc etc. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:33, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete Found [1] with a quick google search. Right now I can't actually access any page that has to do with gaming as i'm on the airforce network, so ill check back when im on my own PC. I will probably change it to a full Delete once I can fully look things up. Jcmcc (Talk) 15:47, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

After looking through on my own system, I decided to leave it at weak delete. Though all sources are weak, there are many of them. Sheer numbers alone merit something. Lots of various reviews availible. Definitely not an "unknown" game but still probably too WP:TOOSOON. Jcmcc (Talk) 17:22, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:48, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:48, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It has two reviews: [2][3] czar 20:15, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete or Merge for now, for similar reasons that jcmcc stated. It's too soon, and could be a short blurb on the game company's wiki until then.Bahb the Illuminated (talk) 21:02, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now and draft and userfy if needed until a better article is available. SwisterTwister talk 21:33, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Covered in multiple reliable sources. Czar's links above, and also [4][5][6]. - hahnch e n 20:51, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 19:07, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 18:41, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.