Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Styles and Themes of Joss Whedon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 17:53, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Styles and Themes of Joss Whedon[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete - 100% original research. Are You The Cow Of Pain? (talk) 17:32, 18 September 2010 (UTC) Struck comment of indef-blocked sockpuppet. The nominator's opinion will be discounted in the closure decision per #3 WP:SK. QuAz GaA 16:43, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:01, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:02, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Original research article and no sources. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 18:47, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy back to author User:Morda898 and tag it as personal essay. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 20:55, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, total OR. If there was anything from a reliable source I'd suggest merging that content to Joss Whedon, but there doesn't appear to be anything. Roscelese (talk) 21:49, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, blatant original research. Userfication would be appropriate in a situation in which the creator could possibly incubate the article, but the lack of sourcing, tone, etc., seem to indicate that isn't likely. --Kinu ^t/_c 03:30, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The nominator of this article has been indef-blocked as a sockpuppet of indef-blocked abusive puppetmaster User:Otto4711. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 03:47, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.