Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Style of the Swedish sovereign

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Remember that sources don't need to be in an article to contribute to establishing notability; see WP:NEXIST. (non-admin closure) Actualcpscm^{scrutinize, talk} 19:22, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Style of the Swedish sovereign[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't pass WP:GNG. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 17:46, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and Sweden. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 17:46, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Too long and involved to be a BS article, but there is minimal sourcing with no inline sources. I'd be willing to give it a pass if we had some kind of coverage. I can't find anything, only articles about sovereigns in general. With one source, this could be seen as a copyvio as well. Oaktree b (talk) 19:03, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The Swedish royal titulature is in fact a subject of serious scrutiny. See, e.g., "Rex Vandalorum" and "What about the Finns:". Srnec (talk) 21:21, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - This article needs more RSs, but it passes GNG easily and is eminently encyclopaedic. I see no COPYVIO here at all after reviewing the source. Cheers, Last1in (talk) 14:47, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No sensical reason to delete has been given. The titles and styles of Swedish monarchs are well covered.★Trekker (talk) 19:39, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
where are they covered? I didn't found any coverage in the article!!!! ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 15:31, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Passes WP:GNG with ease indeed.BabbaQ (talk) 13:43, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:24, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.