Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Studio Empoli

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 20:01, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Studio Empoli[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to be notable. Google turns up mostly social media sites and blogs, and even the sources in the article as it stands now are pretty junky. TKK ^{bark !} 18:00, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —Mike moral ♪♫ 20:19, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. —Mike moral ♪♫ 20:20, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I think the article should be kept. It's multinational organization having operational presence in Europe, China and Sub-Continent. Fairly notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.142.170.42 (talk) 11:56, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide links to sources to establish this? Wikipedia needs reliable sources to establish notability. --TKK ^{bark !} 01:09, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^*poke* 19:44, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep The article should be kept. There are few sources that verifies its notability. "With an array of high-class shops already crowding Xinhua Mall in Lahore, the addition of a classy Italian shoe brand seemed justified.

Studio Empoli has been launched in Pakistan bent upon making a mark on the Pakistani fashion market". This news report appeared in one of the most credible newspapers of Pakistan, Dawn <http://archives.dawn.com/weekly/images/archive/070701/images11.htm>. But I believe this article needs some improvement.

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, postdlf (talk) 02:25, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Can't seems to find anything that makes the company notable, on the converse really. I think from research that it's a fairly small, fairly new Italian shoe company. Fails WP:ORG scope_creep (talk) 23:51, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Promotion, no third party commentary, fails the higher bar for trading companies, WP:CORP. The reference supposedly attesting to notability is itself promotion and very unlikely to be independent. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:05, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not a notable company, promotional references. Cabe 6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 10:50, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.