Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stuart Wright Pte. Ltd.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:34, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stuart Wright Pte. Ltd.[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Spam. Œcolampadius (talk) 18:12, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:03, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per A7: non-notable company. Jimmy Pitt talk 19:58, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't find any evidence of notability. Speedy does not seem necessary/appropriate because the article has been around since 2007. --Kvng (talk) 20:53, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment -- The age of the article is immaterial. "Speedy" doesn't imply haste, it refers to the process whereby an article can be deleted without the need for AfD if it meets one of a number of criteria. A7 is the notability criterion, which this article clearly fails. Jimmy Pitt talk 22:25, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy != Haste. My brain hurts. --Kvng (talk) 23:06, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nothing of note here.... Sailsbystars (talk) 18:17, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete If it were solely a problem of spammy text, that could be fixed by editing, not deleting. However, I tried looking up the organisation and all I found was mentions in business directories, job ads, &c - not substantial enough coverage to establish notability under WP:COMPANY. bobrayner (talk) 01:37, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.