Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stuart Rudd (musician)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)Davey2010Talk 23:42, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stuart Rudd (musician)[edit]

Stuart Rudd (musician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:BAND and WP:GNG. I could not locate any reliable sources to add to the page. The only source provided is a primary source from the musician's band website. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 23:45, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: only reference I found other than the aforementioned site was on a Wiki page with only a brief mention. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ Talk 23:53, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:20, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:20, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Current references now seem indicate quite sufficient notability. Aoziwe (talk) 13:46, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep have added additional information, sufficient to satisfy WP:GNG. Reliable sources are easy to locate if you search. Dan arndt (talk) 05:35, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to The Superjesus. Article is basically a rehash of that. He lacks independent notability. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:45, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Member of Superjesus, Nick Barker & the Reptiles and Southpoor. Passes WP:MUSICBIO.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 22:45, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Just a session muso for Barker, Southpoor are not notable. Does not pass WP:MUSICBIO. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:57, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Southpoor don't have an article but they do have two notable members: Rudd and Garner (Nick Costa Band, Nick Barker & the Reptiles) and so they are notable.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 23:48, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Southpoor are notable because Rudd is and Rudd is because Southpoor are? Nice bit of circular reasoning you've got there. duffbeerforme (talk) 23:07, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That does not meet WP:MUSICBIO, need multiple bands. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:57, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep in its current form it is a valid standalone item, see no reason for deletion or changing JarrahTree 09:14, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
How so? duffbeerforme (talk) 11:57, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.