Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stu Mason

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:48, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stu Mason[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found no coverage. Fails WP:CREATIVE. SL93 (talk) 22:56, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:29, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- I am somewhat doubtful whether the magazine that he allegedly edits is notable; and I note no link to it in the artilce. Even if it was, I do not think that this would make its editor notable. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:12, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The link to this "magazine" is broken, and in any event there aren't any reliable sources discussing it, and in any event even if the magazine cleared the notability standards of which it falls far, far short, notability is not inherited. Article pretty much the sole Wikipedia activity of a SPA who vanished years ago, orphaning it. Fails the GNG and about any other notability criterion. Ravenswing 04:08, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The claim to notability is being an editor of a magazine, but the magazine is not notable. -- Whpq (talk) 16:11, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.