Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stu Maddux

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:11, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stu Maddux[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article, seems a COI. The one independent film he produced *might* be notable, but the sources seem to be talking round him, or in most cases, don't pass WP:RS Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 14:40, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 16:58, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 16:58, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep at pushing at WP:FILMMAKER and WP:GNG. Rather than being thought a BLP1E, we do not have just one film. He produced 2, directed 3, and wrote & edited two. Short career, yes... but coverage for more than one thing. In their lengthy article, Edge writes "Director Stu Maddux has made some compelling documentaries". And toward FILMMAKER, his work Gen Silent has been itself the recpient of in-depth commentary and analysis in multiple secondary sources... sources which also offer decent information about Maddux as a filmmker. Third Coast Digest After Elton Gayapolis Hartford Courant Qnotes Pride Source and Houston Chronicle to share but a few. The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette calls him "Six-time Emmy award winner Stu Maddux..." and we have many others available through searches. Article needs some work, certainly... but when a filmmaker or his works recieve enough coverage, we have notability enough for Wikiedia. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 04:17, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There is enough notability for the article.Vincelord (talk) 15:00, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. AutomaticStrikeout 23:29, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 20:32, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.