Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Streetboxing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.--Kubigula (talk) 04:56, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Streetboxing[edit]

As I said on the article's talk page, it's either a hoax or so ungodly unnotable that nobody on the Internet has ever heard of it; "streetboxing" + "buisman" returns zero results on Google. Gromlakh (talk) 01:52, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Sounds an awful lot like "Street boxing" (two words) which existed before this was supposedly invented in 2004. Mandsford (talk) 03:29, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not enough reliable sources.-Wafulz (talk) 03:53, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No sources. No links. No relevant Google results. No article. ~ Carlin _{U T C} @ 04:06, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Week Delete Not enough sources to make fair judgement and with out them it falls. --Nate1481(^t/_c) 09:47, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. nn. --Bradeos Graphon (talk) 18:44, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of martial arts-related deletion discussions. -- Nate1481(^t/_c) 09:47, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Forget "not enough sources", this has no sources at all. Combined with a lack of ghits, probably non-notable. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 19:00, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry meant after looking around the net, lack of much obviously linked, there are more sources or a DVD of the same name, by someone else... --Nate1481(^t/_c) 10:20, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete nn, unsourced. JJL (talk) 0:21, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Delete per WP:NFT. JuJube (talk) 07:57, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete No sources, poorly written, unencyclopediac. So many reasons to delete.Pookakitty (talk) 12:41, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.