Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Street Cause

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 01:57, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Street Cause[edit]

Street Cause (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORGCRIT, unable to find non-trivial coverage of this NGO in reliable sources. funplussmart (talk) 21:41, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 01:00, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 01:00, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, reads too much like an advert. Almy (talk) 01:44, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Can we please take a moment here. And not just jump to a decision yet. I'm modifying the article to fit Wikipedia's standards if you point out the problems. And perhaps consider giving people a day or two to work on their content before flagging it down.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Manisha Jukareddy (talkcontribs) 04:13, May 18, 2019 (UTC)

  • Comment @Manisha Jukareddy:, if an article is not ready for other Wikipedia editors (let alone the public) to read it, it would be better to write it as a draft (see Wikipedia:Article_wizard) or to start it in your Sandbox (see the "Sandbox" link at the very top of the page, next to your username), and also Help:My sandbox. As soon as it's in the main Wikipedia space, other editors will start assessing it. RebeccaGreen (talk) 09:13, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've added links to the article and further modified the language so it doesn't come across as an advertisement. The Street Cause article, I feel, is informative because it describes a lot about this organization's work as an NGO. Which is why I hope you consider keeping it on Wikipedia. (talkcontribs) 11:31, May 19, 2019 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 01:57, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.