Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strawberry Swing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Viva la Vida or Death and All His Friends. Cirt (talk) 03:28, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Strawberry Swing[edit]

A non-notable song which has not ranked on national or significant music chart, won significant awards or honors, or has been performed independently by several notable artists, bands or groups. Fails WP:NSONGS. I previously redirected and nominated for PROD but these have been reverted. JD554 (talk) 18:58, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —JD554 (talk) 19:00, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:NSONGS. Lәo_(βǃʘʘɱ) 19:27, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not a notable song, no significant sources. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 19:57, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect back to Viva la Vida or Death and All His Friends as has been done two times previously, as it suggests in WP:NSONGS. No need to delete it, it is a useful redirect. However, make sure it stays a redirect.Fingers ^OnRoids 20:59, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - Agreed, no need for it to be deleted, just redirect it to the album. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 21:17, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - per WP:NSONGS. -- Mufka ^(u) ^(t) ^(c) 21:27, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Quantumobserver (talk) 23:02, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Leave It - It is a good page with a good amount of information. Heck, you didn't even nomanate "Postcards from Far Away", and it's not even as long of a page as Strawberry Swing. Don't delete it, edit it. And what does "Don't delete the page, but put it into redirect" or whatever mean?--Das Ansehnlisch (talk) 12:27, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Saying it's a good page isn't enough, you need to explain how it meets the criteria for inclusion on Wikipedia as per WP:NSONGS and WP:GNG. See WP:R for an explanation of redirect. --JD554 (talk) 12:46, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, article fails to establish notability per WP:MUSIC#Songs. Esradekan Gibb ^"Klat" 13:21, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: There are more notable articles like Lhuna which have a dearth of information. Atleast this one is longer. It just needs references. There's decent amount information available. But yes, not a really notable song. Suede67 (talk) 18:54, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.