Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strathdon Caledonia Pipe Band
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:31, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Strathdon Caledonia Pipe Band[edit]
- Strathdon Caledonia Pipe Band (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:MUSIC and WP:ORG. could only find 1 gnews hit [1]. LibStar (talk) 01:52, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Only resources given on the article are the group's own pages. Nothing else as far as that goes. Slight promotional flavor, I think they're trying to get their name out there - that's not what we're for. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 03:03, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 19:42, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per nom Polarpanda (talk) 20:20, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this band. Joe Chill (talk) 23:01, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per nom. I helped edit the article early on, and don't find any notability in the topic or many of the related articles referring the the same type of topics. • Freechild'sup? 10:06, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.