Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strategic Marketing Inc.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:34, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Strategic Marketing Inc.[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Local ad agency that won local awards that do not confer notability. Nothing to be found that meets the requirements of WP:N, and the sourcing that does exist is run of the mill stuff in local business journals. The name is so generic that it turns up a lot of Google hits, but nothing seems to be substantial about this agency. TonyBallioni (talk) 19:38, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article subject does not seem to be notable. Per nom, winning an award in a regional competition does not entail notability. Lack of sources cited in article violates WP:CORPDEPTH, and most mentions of the company are minor or tacked onto media about other brands. SamHolt6 (talk) 20:09, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:06, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:06, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nominator and SamHolt6. Nothing here suggests notability. Jeppiz (talk) 21:00, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 18:24, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.