Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strange Pleasures

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) czar · · 02:27, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Strange Pleasures[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable musical release. No evidence of full-length professional reviews, charting or awards. Stuartyeates (talk) 01:27, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It isn't released until 7 May, so how could it have charted or received awards. It already has one review in a reliable source and a few other pieces of coverage. I think we can wait a few weeks until after it's released to judge whether it's a notable musical release or not. --Michig (talk) 06:01, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Like Michig states above the album is not released until May 7th. It has been added to the Upcoming Release category and members of WikiProject Albums will keep an eye on it. I have added three more reviews that I dug up through a few internet searches. These reviews can be read and more about the initial reaction to the album can be added to the body of the article. We should wait and see and decide after the release of album. -- Beckmanse (talk) 14:42, 30 April 2013 (PDT)
KeepQuantoAltoPossoVolare (talk) 19:41, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.