Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strange Matter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:17, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Strange Matter[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find evidence for notability. It's been tagged for notability for over 7 years. Doug Weller talk 14:07, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:38, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Google can't even find cover images for the majority of the books in the series. The only mentions I can find on the internet are on blogs, goodreads.com and other UGC sites. In the meantime, I've taken a stab at trying to make the article at least look encyclopedic, so that hopefully google searches and wiki mirrors will not have such a poorly written mess to give to their users. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 13:46, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:50, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.