Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strange Frequencies Radio
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. (X! · talk) · @167 · 02:59, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strange Frequencies Radio[edit]
- Strange Frequencies Radio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not seem to satisfy WP:WEB notability guidelines. No third-party recognition and no independent sources seem to have taken notice. ScienceApologist (talk) 00:05, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I'm seeing chatter from fans, and reports from guys (eg Nick Redfern) who have been on the show, but nothing else really. I think it's probably well enough known in the ghosthunter community, but unless they can come up with something that supports notability even in that limited field, I don't think it makes the cut. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 00:32, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: No reliable sources to establish notability. Article looks like an attempt at self publicity by a COI account User:SFR Crew. - LuckyLouie (talk) 02:01, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:02, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, non notable. Anna Lincoln 08:49, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this podcast. Joe Chill (talk) 18:52, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Article created by SFR Crew so COI is pretty likely. They seem like a well-meaning bunch, but nothing comes up in the news, books to reliably establish their notability. Smocking (talk) 22:20, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.