The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 00:16, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Dicdef-ish. Obli (Talk) 22:27, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn. if it's uncommon, why include it in an encyclopedia? analogous to adding "humpalump" as an uncommon english name. DrIdiot 22:58, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per DrIdiot. Possibly transwiki to Serbo-Croatian Wikipedia. Stifle 01:07, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nn. Blnguyen 04:27, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nominated. -- Krash (Talk) 23:34, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
