Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stonks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:45, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stonks[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable internet meme, not enough coverage or sources to demonstrate notability CatcherStorm ^talk 02:56, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CatcherStorm ^talk 02:56, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:WEBCRIT, also possibly fails A7, in that case speedy delete. dibbydib ^💬/_✏ 03:12, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete on account of what was mentioned above. Unless it can be updated to meet WP:WEBCRIT and A7, then it should be deleted. Stub articles don't get a free bypass. Mattx8y (talk) 13:56, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I am the creator of the article and I say you can go ahead and delete it. I want Wikipedia to become a better place. Analog Horror, (Speak) 16:53, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.