Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stoner-comedy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep and redirect to stoner film moink 00:04, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stoner-comedy[edit]

Author inhaled and created a genre on the spot Ruby 04:13, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, but move to Stoner comedy. I've heard the phrase before, and it gets 13,800 hits on Google. --Allen 04:18, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Stoner film per Kinu. --Allen 04:47, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect (if appropriate) to Stoner film. --Kinu 04:35, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and delete to Stoner film per Kinu (if there's anything in there that can be salvaged, which doesn't appear likely), as this is actually a genre. --Rory0 96 04:43, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete straight up per Ruby. Stoner film already covers all material in this article, and nobody is likely to search for the phrase 'Stoner-comedy'. --Lockley 05:36, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to stoner film. The creator of this article changed the links to stoner film on the Harold & Kumar Go to White Castle page to point to stoner-comedy, then filled in the resulting redlink. Stoner film is an accurate and more widely recognized term for such movies (which, unless I'm missing something, are pretty much always comedies, so distinguishing "stoner comedy" from "stoner film" would be kind of pointless). Don't think there's anything useful to merge, but redirects are cheap, fun, and easy. -- Jonel | Speak 05:42, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete implausible redirect and not worth keeping. Adrian Lamo ·· 07:21, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirects are cheap. Elfguy 14:00, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Stoner film —-- That Guy, From That Show! ^(talk) 2006-02-08 15:22Z
Redirect per consensus.--Isotope23 18:09, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect. Redirects are cheap, and this is plausible. youngamerican (talk) 19:08, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect -- to Stoner film - Longhair 19:09, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per all of the above. Dustimagic *\o/* ^{(talk/contribs)} *\o/* 22:14, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.